One of the miniatures in the private collection that I am cataloguing is this leaf with a fine miniature of a Tree of Affinity:
I already knew it from reproductions is a series of dealer an auction catalogues from the past few decades:
Sunday, 9 July 2017
|Michal Habdank-Wojnicz, alias Wilfrid Voynich|
Posted by Peter Kidd at 15:56
Monday, 5 June 2017
Following my blog post about Henry Huth, Ian Jackson contacted me with the following amusing note about his son Alfred (shown above), which I share with his permission:
"The younger Huth is also worthy of attention. He wanted to marry his cousin, but his (or their) parents forbade it on grounds of consanguinity. He then spent several years studying the subject, producing not only a thin (but pioneering) bibliography on the marriage of near kin, but a fat book on its history and anthropology, abundantly documented as only a bookworm could.
His conclusion was that the only form of incest generally condemned around the globe was between parties of vastly different age. The family realized that they're been let off lightly, and consented to the marriage. It's the most heartwarming story of applied bibliography I know."
Here are some of Alfred Huth's publications:
- The marriage of near kin considered with respect to the laws of nations, the results of experience and the teachings of biology (London, 1885, second edition 1887).
- "The Fertilization of Plants and Consanguineous Marriage ...", The Westminster Review (London, 1877).
- An Index to books and papers on marriage between near kin. From the Appendix to the Report of the Index Society (London, 1879).
Posted by Peter Kidd at 06:03
Saturday, 27 May 2017
|Mark Lansburgh [Source]|
Posted by Peter Kidd at 07:47
Friday, 19 May 2017
On a recent Saturday in New York I visited the Public Library and examined a few manuscripts that were - understandably - not considered sufficiently beautiful or interesting for inclusion in the 2006 Splendors of the Word exhibition.
Posted by Peter Kidd at 20:03
Saturday, 29 April 2017
I spent part of the Easter weekend sorting through my filing-cabinet of photocopies. Among them was a brief article by Judith Oliver in an old issue of the Walters Art Gallery Bulletin, called "Manuscripts, Scissors, and Paste" (vol.31, no.3, December 1978, pp.[1-2]), in which she discusses two examples of manuscripts being cut up.